All posts by Practical Law Dispute Resolution

REUTERS | David Gray

Change is on the horizon, in the form of compulsion to mediate civil disputes. In the meantime, the ebb and flow of a judicial policy of “encouragement” and “sanction” continues.

The court’s efforts at encouragement have fortunately not taken the extreme form contemplated in 2013 in Wright v Michael Wright Supplies:

“You may be able to drag the horse (a mule offers a better metaphor) to water, but you cannot force the wretched animal to drink if it stubbornly resists. I suppose you can make it run around the litigation course so vigorously that in a muck sweat it will find the mediation trough more friendly and desirable. But none of that provides the real answer.

(Paragraph 3, judgment.)

Continue reading

REUTERS | GCS

The last few years have seen a large emphasis on the use of technology. Businesses and law firms alike have had to adapt to meet the changing climate. An increasing number of meetings are now being held virtually, documents can easily be signed using online platforms and, most of all, emails have now become the most preferred method of communication in a business.

Therefore, many law firms have opted to communicate and serve proceedings using emails as this is time efficient, saves costs and advances sustainability. However, the question remains: is service by email valid?

Continue reading

REUTERS | Mike Blake

The Civil Justice Council is consulting on a wholesale revision of the civil costs regime; the consultation ends at 12 noon on Friday 30 September 2022.

In the last piece, I looked at pre-action costs and the interplay with fixed recoverable costs due to be extended in April 2023.

Here, I look at the connected issues of costs budgeting and guideline hourly rates, and in each case, the consultation paper asks whether they should be abolished altogether.

Continue reading

Share this post on: