REUTERS | Eddie Keogh

At first glance, awarding a law firm based in Canary Wharf (one of the main financial hubs in the world) hourly rates in line with City of London rates may not come as a huge surprise. You would be forgiven for not realising that the post code of Canary Wharf (E14) in fact classifies it as an outer London area in accordance with the bandings of the guideline hourly rates.

As such, in Shulman v Kolomoisky and another, the claimant challenged the hourly rates sought by the second defendant (represented by Canary Wharf-based Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, a leading US firm) on the basis that the starting point for the assessment should be the Band 3 London guideline rates, and that the nature of the work would mean that an hourly rate somewhere between the City and outer London rates would be appropriate.

Continue reading

REUTERS | Ibraheem Abu Mustafa

The new CPR 81 (new rules) came into force on 1 October 2020, replacing the former CPR 81 (old rules). It provided a welcome update to the procedure for civil committal proceedings, significantly streamlining the rules from 38 to ten, and disposing of the clunky Practice Direction 81 entirely.

It is intended that the overhaul will simplify the codified procedure for bringing contempt of court proceedings. However, in the absence of any transitional period, how does the rule change affect practitioners whose clients’ existing contempt proceedings straddle both the new and old rules?

Continue reading

REUTERS | Gary Hershorn

This blog post examines the defence of illegality following the recent judgment of the Supreme Court in Stoffel & Co. v Grondona, identifying two particularly persuasive arguments since Patel v Mirza.

Stoffel will be of particular interest to claimants and defendants alike, especially in the context of professional negligence claims. The decision further clarifies the test for illegality and confirms the persuasive force of arguments of consistency and the purpose of the criminal prohibition in issue.

Continue reading