REUTERS | Jean-Paul Pelissier

The case of Flame SA v Glory Wealth Shipping PTE Ltd is a warning to parties considering a repudiatory breach claim to first consider whether, at the time of the breach, they were in a position to perform their own contractual obligations. If not, it may not be worth their while to sue, as this case has determined that any damages awarded will be nominal rather than substantial. In the brave new world of costs after the Jackson reforms, there will be substantial costs risk in pursuing such claims.
Continue reading