The modern law of abuse of process was set out by the House of Lords in Johnson v Gore Wood & Co. For present purposes, the “underlying public interest” that “there should be finality in litigation and that a party should not be twice vexed in the same matter” (per Lord Bingham at 31) gives rise to two separate types of abuse. The first is res judicata in the form of cause of action estoppel or issue estoppel, where a cause of action or issue has already been raised in earlier proceedings and decided by the court. The second is traditionally known as Henderson v Henderson abuse, where a claim or defence is raised which should have been raised in earlier proceedings but was not. Continue reading

REUTERS | Vincent Kessler
September 24, 2015
The Aldi requirement: not a soft touch

REUTERS | Corbis
September 22, 2015
Asset recovery in fraud claims: outsourcing to private investigators
In the third of four posts on asset recovery in fraud claims, Arun Chauhan and Elizabeth Rhodes consider issues around the appointment of private investigators and some of the potential pitfalls in outsourcing to these third parties. Continue reading

REUTERS | Amit Dave
September 22, 2015
Dispute resolution clauses: the not so friendly “friendly discussion”
“Friendly discussion”. Two words that perhaps on first sight appear uncontroversial as to their meaning. However, when put into the dispute resolution clause of a contract, these two seemingly simple words can create issues from a contractual certainty perspective.