REUTERS | Toru Hanoi

Since costs management was introduced in April 2013, one of its key difficulties has been the strain that it has placed on the court’s resources. In part, this is due to often hotly contested arguments over the party’s respective budgets. The pressure became so great in the RCJ that cost budgeting in clinical negligence matters was temporarily suspended in the latter half of 2015, to allow the court to deal with the backlog.

This fundamental problem with costs management appears to have been at the forefront of the minds of those drafting the 83rd update to the CPR, which came into force on 6 April 2016. Of those changes to the rules which affect costs management, the focus now appears to be on encouraging the parties to reach agreement in so far as is possible, and reducing the level of intervention required from the court. Continue reading

REUTERS | Mike Blake

Napoléon Bonaparte:

“Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.”

As litigators, we generally regard it our overriding duty to obtain the best possible result for our clients by (within reason) every means available to us. However, the duty to our clients is tempered in several respects. One of the quandaries that can, and does, arise in litigation is whether or not one is obliged to highlight the errors of another party, particularly where it is in your client’s best interests not to do so. Continue reading

REUTERS | Srdjan Zivulovic

I was delighted to have the chance to put a few questions to Sir Colin Birss, judge of the High Court Chancery Division and nominated judge of the Patents Court.

In part 1 of my interview with Sir Colin, he talks about his career and interests. In part 2, he gives some perspectives on current developments in litigation procedure. Finally, in part 3, Sir Colin considers what the future might hold for civil litigation in England and Wales. Continue reading