The US statutory procedure known as “section 1782” can allow a litigant in non-US proceedings to obtain what is tantamount to full US-style discovery from a US based entity, for use in the foreign proceedings. This can be particularly valuable to litigants in jurisdictions that have limited procedures for disclosure of evidence, such as many civil law countries. However, it can also be a useful weapon in the armoury of litigants in other jurisdictions. This is particularly the case in relation to obtaining evidence from third parties, but also potentially to obtain from an opponent evidence not as readily obtainable (or not at a particular time) under the domestic jurisdiction’s own disclosure procedures. Continue reading

REUTERS | Brendan McDermid

REUTERS | Luke MacGregor
March 14, 2017
Remarkably unremarkable: the appeal in Workman v Forrester
The appeal in Workman v Forrester and others is both remarkable and unremarkable. Continue reading

REUTERS | Yuya Shino
March 10, 2017
Merrix and detailed assessment: business as usual?
Much has been written about Merrix v Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust and the consequences it may have for the detailed assessment of costs under CPR 47. Continue reading