All posts by Practical Law Dispute Resolution

REUTERS | Clodagh Kilcoyne

Following the introduction of costs budgeting under section II of Part 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules on 1 April 2013, much has been said, written and done about how it has affected Part 7 multi-track litigation in claims worth at least £50,000 where it is compulsory.

To some, costs budgeting has added an additional layer to the already formidable expense of civil litigation by the front-loading of very significant costs in actions which never reach trial.

To others, costs budgeting has delivered a welcome degree of control over what each party can spend and expect to recover in costs if successful, and what the outlay will be if unsuccessful.

Continue reading

REUTERS | Michaela Rehle

In Jamieson v Wurttemburgische Versicherung AG and another, Master Davison gave an interesting judgment refusing to lift a stay in these proceedings, which had been issued by the claimant against the respective defendants: the insurer of a taxi; and his employer. These proceedings had been stayed by consent pending the outcome of a claim issued in Germany by the insurer seeking a declaration that it was not liable for the claimant’s accident. Instead, Master Davison made a request under Article 29(2) of the Recast Brussels Regulation (1215/2012) asking the German court to confirm the date of filing at court of the insurer’s claim.

Continue reading

REUTERS | Mike Hutchings

The recent High Court judgment in Various Claimants v G4S plc provides important guidance on the ability of claimants to be added to a claim before service, and on amendments to the descriptions of claimants after service where the relevant limitation period arguably has expired.

Continue reading

Share this post on: